Skip to main content
Home

Main menu

  • Textbook
    • Research Methods
    • Disease Causation and Diagnostic
    • Health Information
    • Medical Sociology, Policy and Economics
    • Organisation and Management
    • Further Resources
  • Text Courses
    • Epidemiology
    • Health Information
    • Statistical Methods
  • Video Courses
    • Finding and Appraising the Evidence
    • Learning from Stakeholders
    • Obesity Care Pathway Support Package
    • Programme Budgeting and Marginal Analysis
    • Screening
    • Sustainable Healthcare
  • Training
    • Change Management
    • Collaborative Working for Health
    • Getting the Message Across
    • Health Everyone's Business
    • Health Service Planning
    • Knowledge Management
    • Leadership and Management
    • Policy and Strategy Development
    • Prioritisation and Performance Management
    • Programme and Project Management
    • Supporting the Analyst
    • Teaching Public Health for Action
  • Join FPH
Utility Links
  • About FPH
  • FPH Events
  • Public Health Jobs

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Randomised Control Trials - Guided Critical Appraisal
  3. Q10 - Were all clinically important outcomes considered?

Answer 10

We thought the answer was YES.

The authors had made an effort to consider lots of outcomes including the effect on partners.
Consultation rates in primary care might have been useful.

Book traversal links for Answer 10

  • Q10 - Were all clinically important outcomes considered?
  • Up
  • Q11 - Are the benefits worth the harms and costs?

fph logo

Bluesky Link and Icon

Footer Menu

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy